New York Court of Appeals, 2012

Callistro v. Bebbington

Callistro v. Bebbington
New York Court of Appeals · Decided December 11, 2012
20 N.Y.3d 945; 982 N.E.2d 81
Callistro v. Bebbington

Cases that cite this one

15 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed, with costs, and certified question not answered on the ground that it is unnecessary. Plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact concerning whether defendants’ alleged malpractice in failing to perform a caesarean section rather than a vaginal delivery was the cause of the child’s alleged cognitive, receptive, and expressive deficits and developmental disability.

Concur: Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith and Pigott.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.