Duarte v. City of New York
Cases that cite this one
3 later published cases cite this decision.
- Matter of Medical Professionals for Informed Consent, Individually & On Behalf of Its Members, Kristen Robillard, M.D., Zarina Hernandez-schipplick, M.D., Margaret Florini, A.S.C.P., Olyesya Girich, Rt (r), & Elizabeth Storelli, R.N., Individually & On Behalf of Others Similarly Situated v. Bassett (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2023)
- Matter of Sportsmen's Tavern LLC v. New York State Liq. Auth. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2021)
- Losurdo v. New York State Department of Corrections & Comunity Supervision (New York Supreme Court 2015)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The appeal should be dismissed, without costs, as moot.
Respondent City of New York has asked us to review whether it was error for the Appellate Division to conclude that it was arbitrary and capricious for the New York City Department of Correction to deny petitioner’s application to enter the nursery program at the Rose M. Singer Center at Rikers Island. We agree with petitioner that this proceeding is moot because her child is now of an age that renders him ineligible for participation in the nursery program pursuant to Correction Law § 611. Moreover, in light of the Department of Correction’s revised nursery order, effective February 11, 2013, we decline to invoke the mootness exception (see Matter of Hearst Corp. v Clyne, 50 NY2d 707, 714-715 [1980]).
Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Rivera concur.
Appeal dismissed, without costs, as moot, in a memorandum.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.