New York Court of Appeals, 2013

People v. McFarlane

People v. McFarlane
New York Court of Appeals · Decided August 29, 2013
21 N.Y.3d 1034; 995 N.E.2d 845

People v. McFarlane

Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed. The determination as to whether a defendant has consented to a search involves a mixed question of law and fact (People v Valerio, 95 NY2d 924, 925 [2000]). Where, as here, there exists record support for the Appellate Division’s resolution of this question, the issue is beyond this Court’s further review (id.).

Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott, Rivera and Abdus-Salaam concur.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed, in a memorandum.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.