New York Court of Appeals, 2013

Sato v. Ippudo NY

Sato v. Ippudo NY
New York Court of Appeals · Decided September 12, 2013
21 N.Y.3d 1059; 996 N.E.2d 910

Sato v. Ippudo NY

Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed, with costs. Plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact concerning whether defendants’ alleged negligence in failing to provide adequate warning of the presence of the staircase or adequate lighting in the staircase and surrounding area caused his fall.

Concur: Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott, Rivera and Abdus-Salaam.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.