Sato v. Ippudo NY
Sato v. Ippudo NY
21 N.Y.3d 1059; 996 N.E.2d 910
Sato v. Ippudo NY
Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed, with costs. Plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact concerning whether defendants’ alleged negligence in failing to provide adequate warning of the presence of the staircase or adequate lighting in the staircase and surrounding area caused his fall.
Concur: Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott, Rivera and Abdus-Salaam.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.