The People v. Karen M. Caza
The People v. Karen M. Caza
Opinion
================================================================= This memorandum is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the New York Reports. ----------------------------------------------------------------- No. 231 SSM 23 The People &c., Respondent, v. Karen M. Caza, Appellant.
Submitted by Martin J. McGuinness, for appellant. Respondent, precluded.
MEMORANDUM: The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed. Defendant's argument that County Court erred in enhancing her sentence by departing from its conditional promise to make her two terms of imprisonment run concurrently, is unpreserved for
- 1 - - 2 - SSM No. 23
our review (see CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Hawkins, 11 NY3d 484, 491-493 [2008]). * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules, order affirmed, in a memorandum. Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott, Rivera and Abdus-Salaam concur.
Decided November 20, 2014
- 2 -
Reference
- Status
- Published