New York Court of Appeals, 2014

The People v. Robert L. Ingram

The People v. Robert L. Ingram
New York Court of Appeals · Decided December 19, 2014
The People v. Robert L. Ingram

Opinion

This memorandum is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the New York Reports. ----------------------------------------------------------------- No. 235 SSM 24

The People &c.,

Appellant, v.

Robert L. Ingram,

Respondent.

Submitted by David A. Heraty, for appellant.

Submitted by Sherry A. Chase, for respondent.

MEMORANDUM:

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed. The determination as to whether police have reasonable - 2 - SSM No. 24 suspicion to justify a stop involves a mixed question of law and fact (People v Woods, 98 NY2d 627, 628 [2002]). Where, as here, there exists record support for the Appellate Division's resolution of this question, the issue is beyond this Court's further review. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules, order affirmed, in a memorandum. Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Read, Smith, Pigott, Rivera and Abdus-Salaam concur.

Decided December 16, 2014

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.