People v. Caza

New York Court of Appeals November 20, 2014

People v. Caza, 24 N.Y.3d 1056 (N.Y. 2014)

24 N.E.3d 593

Abdus, Graffeo, Lippman, Pigott, Read, Rivera, Salaam, Smith

Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed. Defendant’s argument that County Court erred in enhancing her sentence by departing from its conditional promise to make her two terms of imprisonment run concurrently is unpreserved for our review (see CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Hawkins, 11 NY3d 484, 491-493 [2008]).

Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott, Rivera and Abdus-Salaam concur.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed, in a memorandum.

Reference

Full Case Name: The People of the State of New York v. Karen M. Caza
Status: Published