New York Court of Appeals, 2014

People v. Ingram

New York Court of Appeals · Decided December 16, 2014 · Abdus, Lippman, Pigott, Read, Rivera, Salaam, Smith

24 N.Y.3d 1105; 26 N.E.3d 242; 2 N.Y.S.3d 414

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

People v. Ingram (N.Y. 2015)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

The determination whether police have reasonable suspicion to justify a stop involves a mixed question of law and fact (People v Woods, 98 NY2d 627, 628 [2002]). Where, as here, there exists record support for the Appellate Division’s resolution of this question, the issue is beyond this Court’s further review.

Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Read, Smith, Pigott, Rivera and Abdus-Salaam concur.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed, in a memorandum.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.