New York Court of Appeals, 2014

Heltz v. Barratt

Heltz v. Barratt
New York Court of Appeals · Decided December 17, 2014 · Abdus, Lippman, Pigott, Read, Rivera, Salaam, Smith
24 N.Y.3d 1185; 27 N.E.3d 471; 3 N.Y.S.3d 757
Heltz v. Barratt

Cases that cite this one

31 later published cases cite this decision. The 25 that cite it most often are listed here.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order af*1187firmed, with costs. Plaintiff failed to produce admissible evidence raising a triable issue of fact concerning whether defendant Barratt had an opportunity to avoid the collision.

Concur: Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Read, Smith, Pigott, Rivera and Abdus-Salaam.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.