New York Court of Appeals, 2015

Olmosperez v. Evans

Olmosperez v. Evans
New York Court of Appeals · Decided October 22, 2015 · Abdussalaam, Fahey, Lippman, Pigott, Rivera, Stein
26 N.Y.3d 1014; 42 N.E.3d 1205; 21 N.Y.S.3d 686
Olmosperez v. Evans

Cases that cite this one

3 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, without costs (see Matter of Linares v Evans, 26 NY3d 1012 [2015] [decided today]; Matter of Silmon v Travis, 95 NY2d 470, 476 [2000]).

Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Pigott, Rivera, AbdusSalaam and Fahey concur; Judge Stein taking no part.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed, without costs, in a memorandum.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.