The People v. Nadine Panton
New York Court of Appeals
The People v. Nadine Panton, 27 N.Y.3d 1144 (N.Y. 2016)
57 N.E.3d 1095
Difiore, Pigott, Rivera, Abdus-Salaam, Stein, Fahey, Garcia
The People v. Nadine Panton
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
Defendant contends that police engaged in improper pre- Miranda custodial interrogation and, as a result, her post- *1145 Miranda written and video statements should have been suppressed. Because defendant did not raise this particular ground either in her suppression motion or at the hearing, it is unpre-served for our review (see People v Gonzalez, 55 NY2d 887, 888 [1982]).
We have considered defendant’s remaining contention and find it to be without merit.
Order affirmed, in a memorandum.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Nadine Panton, Appellant
- Cited By
- 9 cases
- Status
- Published