The People v. Nadine Panton
The People v. Nadine Panton
27 N.Y.3d 1144; 57 N.E.3d 1095
The People v. Nadine Panton
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
Defendant contends that police engaged in improper pre- Miranda custodial interrogation and, as a result, her post- *1145 Miranda written and video statements should have been suppressed. Because defendant did not raise this particular ground either in her suppression motion or at the hearing, it is unpre-served for our review (see People v Gonzalez, 55 NY2d 887, 888 [1982]).
We have considered defendant’s remaining contention and find it to be without merit.
Order affirmed, in a memorandum.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.