New York Court of Appeals, 2016

The People v. Nadine Panton

The People v. Nadine Panton
New York Court of Appeals · Decided June 30, 2016 · Difiore, Pigott, Rivera, Abdus-Salaam, Stein, Fahey, Garcia
27 N.Y.3d 1144; 57 N.E.3d 1095

The People v. Nadine Panton

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

Defendant contends that police engaged in improper pre- Miranda custodial interrogation and, as a result, her post- *1145 Miranda written and video statements should have been suppressed. Because defendant did not raise this particular ground either in her suppression motion or at the hearing, it is unpre-served for our review (see People v Gonzalez, 55 NY2d 887, 888 [1982]).

We have considered defendant’s remaining contention and find it to be without merit.

Chief Judge DiFiore and Judges Pigott, Rivera, Abdus-Salaam, Stein, Fahey and Garcia concur.

Order affirmed, in a memorandum.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.