New York Court of Appeals, 2016

The People v. Nadine Panton

New York Court of Appeals · Decided June 30, 2016 · Difiore, Pigott, Rivera, Abdus-Salaam, Stein, Fahey, Garcia

27 N.Y.3d 1144; 57 N.E.3d 1095

Cases that cite this one

9 later published cases cite this decision.

Panton v. Joseph (District Court, S.D. New York 2025)
People v. Williams (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2025)
People v. Baker (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2023)
The People v. Guillermo Ortiz (N.Y. 2022)
People v. Cardona (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2022)
People v. Abboud (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2021)
People v. Potter (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2021)
People v. Wingate (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2020)
Matter of Luis P. (N.Y. 2018)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

Defendant contends that police engaged in improper pre- Miranda custodial interrogation and, as a result, her post- *1145 Miranda written and video statements should have been suppressed. Because defendant did not raise this particular ground either in her suppression motion or at the hearing, it is unpre-served for our review (see People v Gonzalez, 55 NY2d 887, 888 [1982]).

We have considered defendant’s remaining contention and find it to be without merit.

Chief Judge DiFiore and Judges Pigott, Rivera, Abdus-Salaam, Stein, Fahey and Garcia concur.

Order affirmed, in a memorandum.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.