New York Court of Appeals, 2016

The People v. Eugene Francis

The People v. Eugene Francis
New York Court of Appeals · Decided November 17, 2016
The People v. Eugene Francis

Opinion

This memorandum is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the New York Reports. ----------------------------------------------------------------- No. 222 SSM 31

The People &c.,

Respondent, v.

Eugene Francis,

Appellant.

Submitted by Andrew W. Sayegh, for appellant.

Submitted by Laurie Sapakoff, for respondent.

MEMORANDUM:

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed. Supreme Court had jurisdiction over the case when it corrected an error in a decision issued one day prior based on an objective fact and thereby reinstated certain counts of defendant's - 2 - SSM 31 indictment. Accordingly, there is no basis to disturb the judgment entered upon defendant's guilty plea. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules, order affirmed, in a memorandum. Judges Pigott, Rivera, Abdus-Salaam, Stein, Fahey and Garcia concur. Chief Judge DiFiore took no part.

Decided November 17, 2016

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.