New York Court of Appeals, 2016

Ming Tung v. China Buddhist Ass'n

Ming Tung v. China Buddhist Ass'n
New York Court of Appeals · Decided February 18, 2016 · Abdus, Difiore, Fahey, Garcia, Pigott, Rivera, Salaam, Stein
26 N.Y.3d 1152; 48 N.E.3d 497; 28 N.Y.S.3d 355
Ming Tung v. China Buddhist Ass'n

Cases that cite this one

7 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order of the Appellate Division affirmed, without costs, for the reasons stated by Justice Judith J. Gische at the Appellate Division, First Department (124 AD3d 13 [2014]), and certified question not answered upon the ground that it is unnecessary.

Concur: Chief Judge DiFiore and Judges Pigott, Rivera, Abdus-Salaam, Stein, Fahey and Garcia.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.