People v. Romero
Cases that cite this one
10 later published cases cite this decision.
- Romero v. Rich (District Court, E.D. New York 2022)
- People v. Wright (N.Y. 2024)
- The People v. Guillermo Ortiz (N.Y. 2022)
- People v. Slivienski (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2022)
- the State of Texas v. Eric Scarberry (Tex. App. 2022)
- Romero v. Rich (District Court, E.D. New York 2022)
- People v. Burris (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2018)
- People v. White (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2017)
- People v. Elder (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2017)
- People v. Chinloy (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2017)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed. Defendant’s pre-Miranda statement, while in custody, in response to a detective’s question regarding whether he would like to make a statement should have been suppressed. However, the error in failing to suppress the statement was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt in light of the overwhelming evidence against defendant and there being no reasonable possibility that his statement contributed to the verdict (see People v Rivera, 57 NY2d 453, 456 [1982]). Additionally, there is record support for Supreme Court’s decision to deny defendant’s motion to suppress the showup identification (see People v Clark, 85 NY2d 886 [1995]), and that decision is beyond our further review.
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed, in a memorandum.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.