Bennett v. Hucke
Bennett v. Hucke
28 N.Y.3d 964; 60 N.E.3d 1200
Bennett v. Hucke
Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order, insofar as appealed from, affirmed, with costs. Plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact whether defendants-respondents Alan Kirk et al. are subject to general contractor liability for when James Bennett was injured.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.