New York Court of Appeals, 2016

Bennett v. Hucke

Bennett v. Hucke
New York Court of Appeals · Decided August 30, 2016 · Abdus, Difiore, Fahey, Garcia, Pigott, Rivera, Salaam, Stein
28 N.Y.3d 964; 60 N.E.3d 1200

Bennett v. Hucke

Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order, insofar as appealed from, affirmed, with costs. Plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact whether defendants-respondents Alan Kirk et al. are subject to general contractor liability for when James Bennett was injured.

Concur: Chief Judge DiFiore and Judges Pigott, Rivera, Abdus-Salaam, Stein, Fahey and Garcia.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.