New York Court of Appeals, 2017

People v. Smart

People v. Smart
New York Court of Appeals · Decided June 29, 2017 · Difiore, Fahey, Feinman, Garcia, Rivera, Stein, Wilson
29 N.Y.3d 1098; 81 N.E.3d 379

People v. Smart

Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed. The record supports the Appellate Division’s finding that the challenged lineup was not unduly suggestive. Accordingly, defendant’s claim is beyond our further review (People v McBride, 14 NY3d 440, 448 [2010] [citation omitted]).

Chief Judge DiFiore and Judges Rivera, Stein, Fahey, Garcia and Wilson concur; Judge Feinman taking no part.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed, in a memorandum.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.