New York Court of Appeals, 2021

The People v. Alex Perez

The People v. Alex Perez
New York Court of Appeals · Decided March 30, 2021

The People v. Alex Perez

Opinion

State of New York MEMORANDUM Court of Appeals This memorandum is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the New York Reports.

No. 45 SSM 5 The People &c., Respondent, v. Alex Perez, Appellant.

Submitted by Matthew C. Hug, for appellant.

Submitted by Emily Schultz, for respondent.

MEMORANDUM: The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed. Any error was harmless because, in the circumstances presented, the proof of defendant’s guilt was overwhelming, even after excising the disputed evidence. Further, no reasonable possibility exists that -1- -2- SSM No. 5 admission of that evidence contributed to defendant’s conviction (see People v Mairena, 34 NY3d 473, 484-485 [2019]; People v Crimmins, 36 NY2d 230, 237, 241-242 [1975]).

Defendant’s arguments concerning the weight of the evidence and the harshness of his sentence are not reviewable, and his other assertions are unavailing.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules, order affirmed, in a memorandum. Chief Judge DiFiore and Judges Rivera, Stein, Fahey, Garcia and Wilson concur.

Decided March 30, 2021

-2-

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.