The People v. Stanley Holmes

New York Court of Appeals

The People v. Stanley Holmes

Opinion

State of New York                                              MEMORANDUM
Court of Appeals                                          This memorandum is uncorrected and subject to
                                                        revision before publication in the New York Reports.




 No. 71 SSM 2
 The People &c.,
         Respondent,
      v.
 Stanley Holmes,
         Appellant.




 Submitted by Megan D. Byrne, for appellant.
 Submitted by Michael J. Yetter, for respondent.




 MEMORANDUM:

       The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, and a new trial ordered. In

 contrast to People v Duarte (
37 NY3d 1218
 [2022]), the trial court here recognized

 defendant as having unequivocally requested to proceed pro se. However, the court failed

 to conduct the required “‘searching inquiry’ to ensure that the defendant’s waiver [of the

 right to counsel] is knowing, intelligent, and voluntary” (People v Silburn, 
31 NY3d 144, 150
 [2018] [internal quotation omitted]).



                                             -1-
                                         -2-                                SSM No. 2


On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules, order reversed, and a
new trial ordered, in a memorandum. Chief Judge Wilson and Judges Rivera, Garcia,
Singas, Cannataro and Troutman concur. Judge Halligan took no part.

Decided June 13, 2023




                                         -2-


Reference

Status
Published