New York Court of Appeals, 2026

Mega Beverage Redemption Ctr., Inc. v. City of Mount Vernon

Mega Beverage Redemption Ctr., Inc. v. City of Mount Vernon
New York Court of Appeals · Decided April 16, 2026
2026 NY Slip Op 02361
Mega Beverage Redemption Ctr., Inc. v. City of Mount Vernon

Opinion

<div>Mega Beverage Redemption Ctr., Inc. v City of Mount Vernon - 2026 NY Slip Op 02361

<div> skip to main content </div>

<div> <p>It appears you are using Adblock. Please disable Adblock to best experience our website.</p> </div>

<div> <header> <div> <img src="/reporter/images/nys-logo-white.svg" alt=""> </div> <div> <span title="Law Reporting Bureau Home Page">Law Reporting <br>Bureau <span></span></span> <span>Thomas J.K. Smith, State Reporter</span> <nav> Court Decisions Resources About </nav> </div> <div> <img src="/reporter/images/lrb-seal.png" alt=""> </div> </header> </div>

<nav> <ol> <li>Home</li> <li>All Court Decisions</li> <li>Decisions</li> </ol> </nav> <div> <div> <h1>Mega Beverage Redemption Ctr., Inc. v City of Mount Vernon</h1> <p>2026 NY Slip Op 02361</p> <p>April 16, 2026</p> <p>Court of Appeals</p> <p>Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.</p> <p>This decision is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.</p> </div> <div> <p>Mega Beverage Redemption Center, Inc., Appellant,</p> <p>v</p> <p>City of Mount Vernon, Respondent.</p> </div> <p>Decided on April 16, 2026</p> <p>No. 65 SSM 8</p> <div> <p>Scott A. Eisman, for appellant.</p> <p>Lisa A. LeCours, for respondent.</p> </div> <span>[*1]</span> <p>On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed, with costs, and judgment absolute dismissing the complaint granted upon plaintiff's stipulation. Plaintiff has failed to demonstrate that its appeal to the Appellate Division did not present questions of fact, and the Appellate Division did not recite "either that the questions of fact have not been considered or that the court has considered the questions of fact and has determined that it would not grant a new trial or hearing upon those questions," as specified in CPLR 5615 (<i>see</i> Arthur Karger, Powers of the New York Court of Appeals, § 8:10, at 278-279 [3d ed rev 2005]). Therefore, this Court is bound to affirm and render judgment absolute (<i>see</i> CPLR 5615). Chief Judge Wilson and Judges Rivera, Garcia, Singas, Cannataro, Troutman and Halligan concur.</p> <p>Decided April 16, 2026</p> </div>

<div> <footer> <div> <p>Court Decisions</p> All Court Decisions Official Reports Service Bound Volumes Decision Search </div> <div> <p>Resources</p> RSS Feeds Style Manual Citation Tools Opinion Formatting &amp; Privacy Guidelines Opinion Selection Criteria Legal Research Portal Site Index </div> <div> <p>About</p> About the Law Reporting Bureau About our Operations Contact Us Twitter </div> <div> <p>Quick Contact Info</p> <p>17 Lodge Street</p> <p>Albany, NY 12207</p> <p>Phone: (518) 453-6900</p> </div> </footer> </div> <div> <p>Links to or from other sites do not signify endorsement or relationship with them.</p> </div>

</div>

Opinion

Mega Beverage Redemption Ctr., Inc. v City of Mount Vernon - 2026 NY Slip Op 02361
skip to main content

It appears you are using Adblock. Please disable Adblock to best experience our website.

Law Reporting
Bureau
Thomas J.K. Smith, State Reporter

Mega Beverage Redemption Ctr., Inc. v City of Mount Vernon

2026 NY Slip Op 02361

April 16, 2026

Court of Appeals

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This decision is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Mega Beverage Redemption Center, Inc., Appellant,

v

City of Mount Vernon, Respondent.

Decided on April 16, 2026

No. 65 SSM 8

Scott A. Eisman, for appellant.

Lisa A. LeCours, for respondent.

[*1]

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed, with costs, and judgment absolute dismissing the complaint granted upon plaintiff's stipulation. Plaintiff has failed to demonstrate that its appeal to the Appellate Division did not present questions of fact, and the Appellate Division did not recite "either that the questions of fact have not been considered or that the court has considered the questions of fact and has determined that it would not grant a new trial or hearing upon those questions," as specified in CPLR 5615 (see Arthur Karger, Powers of the New York Court of Appeals, § 8:10, at 278-279 [3d ed rev 2005]). Therefore, this Court is bound to affirm and render judgment absolute (see CPLR 5615). Chief Judge Wilson and Judges Rivera, Garcia, Singas, Cannataro, Troutman and Halligan concur.

Decided April 16, 2026

Court Decisions

All Court Decisions Official Reports Service Bound Volumes Decision Search

Resources

RSS Feeds Style Manual Citation Tools Opinion Formatting & Privacy Guidelines Opinion Selection Criteria Legal Research Portal Site Index

About

About the Law Reporting Bureau About our Operations Contact Us Twitter

Quick Contact Info

17 Lodge Street

Albany, NY 12207

Phone: (518) 453-6900

Links to or from other sites do not signify endorsement or relationship with them.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.