In re the Accounting of the Guardian of O'Neil
Opinion of the Court
The counsel for the guardian has very frankly and properly admitted here in Court, that his client .should be removed from his trust. This guardian, . whose name is David M. Melliss, was- appointed to take care of the minor’s property in September, 1857. On the 19th of the same month, the sum of $939.52 came into his . possession, as, such guardian,- in cash, being the proceeds of his ward’s interest in certain lands ■ as one of the heirs of Tighe Davy, as ascertained by a partition suit in the Supreme Court, and paid over by the referee.
.. -It appears by the testimony that Mr. Melliss gave this money into the hands of his brother-in-law, Mr. David .Tweedie, on the 13th January, 1858, .together- with.; some
Having thus handed over the greater part of his ward’s little fortune to an utterly irresponsible person, to be used by him in his discretion, and without any security, Mr. Melliss, the guardian, has never made any attempt, according to his own testimony, to reduce the rest of it to possession, or even, to ascertain its nature or whereabouts. He states in his account, that his ward is entitled to a further sum of $381.62, from the estate of which she is an heir; and he swears on his examination that he “has never done anything to ascertain in whose hands it is.” It is probably fortunate for his ward that it never came into his possession.
A decree will be entered, by which David M. Melliss will be instantly removed from the guardianship of the estate of Mary C. O’Neil.
The guardian must be charged on his accounting with the sum of $939.52, received by him on the 19th of September, 1857, and with lawful interest thereon to the date of the decree on accounting, and must be credited with
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.