In re the Accounting in Somerville's Estate
Opinion of the Court
The accounts of the public administrator, as administrator of .the goods of. this intestate, were settled by the Surrogate; and, among others, Ann B. Mayell, a judgment creditor, was ordered to be paid $1,556.41 in satisfaction of her claim.
Upon an order to show cause, the public administrator shows that he did not have the paying of this sum, which duty the law of 1866 imposed upon the late Comptroller. The late Comptroller shows, on a similar order, that he paid the petitioner’s attorneys of record.
Upon referring to the decree entered in this Court, we find that the administrator was directed to pay, not the attorneys of the judgment creditor, but the creditor herself. Had this payment to the attorneys been made by the public administrator himself, under that decree, I would have held the payment not to be good. But the law of 1866 has stepped in and directed another official, over whose acts the Surrogate has no jurisdiction in this matter, to wit, the Comptroller of the city, to perform the administrator’s duty in making payments; and the Comptroller has paid the attorneys.
I have no power to compel the payment of this money to the petitioner, either by the Comptroller or by her attorneys, and must leave her to her remedy in the Courts of Law.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.