New York Surrogate's Court, 1883

Joel v. Ritterman

Joel v. Ritterman
New York Surrogate's Court · Decided May 15, 1883
2 Dem. Sur. 242

Counsel

Geo. P. Avery, for petitioner., Wm. King Hall, for respondent.

Joel v. Ritterman

Opinion of the Court

The Surrogate.

The recent decision of the Court of Appeals, in the Matter of Dissosway (91 N. Y., 235), .seems to establish that the proper procedure applicable to the issue of execution herein is that which is prescribed by the Code.

In filing a transcript of the decree, therefore, and in 'docketing the same, this applicant has pursued the cor*243rect practice. But lie does not need to obtain leave oí the Surrogate before asserting his right to issue execution. Section 1825 of the Code is inapplicable to such a case as the present, where, by § 2554, execution must issue as of course.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.