New York Surrogate's Court, 1888

Schwartz v. Bruder

Schwartz v. Bruder
New York Surrogate's Court · Decided June 15, 1888
6 Dem. Sur. 169

Counsel

Henry Fuehrer, for petitioner:, Edward P. Schell, for next of kin :

Schwartz v. Bruder

Opinion of the Court

The Surrogate.

In this proceeding I am required to pass upon the validity of the following clause of *171the will of decedent: “ I hereby direct that my executor hereinafter named to have masses read for the repose of my soul for which I direct him to expend the sum of five hundred dollars.” I am constrained by the decision of the Court of Appeals in the case of Holland v. Alcock (108 N. Y., 312) to determine this disposition to be invalid.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.