New York Surrogate's Court, 1912

In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Proceeding of Bauerdorf

In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Proceeding of Bauerdorf
New York Surrogate's Court · Decided October 15, 1912 · Cohalan
9 Mills Surr. 464; 77 Misc. 655; 138 N.Y.S. 682

Counsel

Hugo H. Ritterbusch, for executor., Richard H. Bruno, for Elizabeth Barth., Leon Lewin, for Johannes Heintz., Jacob E. Solomon, special guardian.

In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Proceeding of Bauerdorf

Opinion of the Court

Cohalan, S.

The term “ issue ” in the third paragraph of "the will is used by the testator in a general and unrestricted sense and all the descendants of each of the sisters and the brother are entitled to share equally in such part of the estate as he or she woiild have become entitled to upon surviving the life beneficiary. Drake v. Drake, 134 N. Y. 220; Soper v. Brown, 136 id. 244; United States Trust Co. v. Tobias, 21 Abb. N. C. 392. Renotice decree for settlement.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.