In re the Estate of Beinhauer
Opinion of the Court
The proponent moves to dismiss the objections filed in this probate proceeding by the trustee in bankruptcy of two of the sons of the testatrix. The codicil offered with the will excludes these two sons from any participation in the estate. The petition in bankruptcy was filed and the adjudication occurred prior to the death of the testatrix. The son Gustavus was adjudicated a bankrupt on July 18, 1921, and the son Edward, August 11, 1921. The testatrix died on January 9, 1922. After the commencement of the probate proceeding the trustee filed objections, claiming to represent the bankrupts’ interests as next of kin. The motion to dismiss is granted.
Subdivision 5 of section 70a of the Bankruptcy Act confers upon the trustee title to property which the bankrupt by any means could have transferred or which might have been levied upon or sold by judicial process. It confers no right upon the trustee here, since there was no vested interest in the next of kin until the death of their mother. Matter of Seal, 261 Fed. Rep. 112. There mere expectation of acquiring property does not constitute property or title to property, and, therefore, cannot be transferred or levied upon. The trustee is, therefore, not an interested party in this proceeding under Surrogate’s Court Act, §§ 147, 314, subd. 11.
Submit order accordingly.
Ordered accordingly.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.