In re the Final Judicial Settlement of the Account of Proceedings of Douglass
Opinion of the Court
The court in admitting the will of the above-named decedent to probate held to be void paragraphs “ second,” “ third,” “ fourth ” and the appointment of Lizzie C. Douglass as executrix in paragraph “ seventh.” The court is now asked to construe said will as to the distribution of the estate.
Elizabeth C. Douglass, the mother, predeceased the testatrix
The words “ before the termination of the trust created in Paragraph Fifth herein ” are meaningless and must be rejected as they are not consistent with the context of the will. Matter of Hunt, 116 Misc. Rep. 23; Matter of Buechner, 226 N. Y. 440. In legal contemplation, a gift to a class is a gift of an aggregate sum to a body of persons uncertain in number at the time of the gift, to be ascertained at a future time, who are all to take in equal or in some definite proportions, the share of each being dependent for its amount upon the ultimate number. 1 Jarman Wills (Big. 6th Am. ed.), 269; Matter of Kimberly, 150 N. Y. 90.
Here the general scheme of the will supports the interpretation that the number of persons to partake of the gift was to be determined at the death of the sister Mary C. Odell. The brother, mother and sister were vested with the corpus of the trust for the sister Mary C. Odell, subject to be divested thereof if they failed to survive her. The share of each could only be determined when it became known who of said three persons were to survive Mary C. Odell. The brother and sister were the only ones of the three persons named to survive Mary C. Odell; thus they received her trust estate and each thereby became entitled to one-half of the whole estate.
Mary O. Schuyler, the daughter of Mary C. Odell, is entitled to any unpaid income due at the time of the death of Mary C. Odell.
Decreed accordingly.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.