New York Surrogate's Court, 1928

In re the Estate of Glickman

In re the Estate of Glickman
New York Surrogate's Court · Decided September 18, 1928 · Wingate
132 Misc. 785; 230 N.Y.S. 671; 1928 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1045

Counsel

Panken & Levy [Matthew M. Levy of counsel], for Sarah H. Glickman., Louis Soil, for the administratrix., Albert D. Schanzer, special guardian.

In re the Estate of Glickman

Opinion of the Court

Wingate, S.

A judgment for alimony is a judgment rendered after a verdict or decision imposing a liability on the husband to pay a particular amount of money, and it does not abate until its purpose is accomplished any more than any other judgment for money. (Carr v. Rischer, 119 N. Y. 117; Van Ness v. Ransom, 215 id. 557.) It follows, therefore, that the claim for interest on unpaid alimony is a proper charge against the estate of the decedent and is allowed. The other objections were disposed of on the hearing. Submit decree on notice.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.