In re the Estate of Hammargren
Opinion of the Court
Upon this motion to fix the estate tax, the question presented is whether a legacy to the teachers’ retirement fund is exempt from tax. The testatrix in her lifetime was a member of the teachers’ retirement system, and the sixth paragraph of her will reads:
“ Sixth. I hereby relinquish all my right, title and interest in the Teachers’ Retirement Fund and give and bequeath to such fund or its lawful custodians all my said interest together with my deposit in the Union Dime Savings Bank.”
The teachers’ retirement system (Greater New York Charter, § 1092) was established as a part of the free educational system of the city of New York. By the charter provision a retirement board is established consisting of seven members: the president of the board of education, the comptroller of the city of New York, two appointees of the mayor of the city of New York, one of whom shall be a member of the board of education, and three members selected by and from among the contributors. The members of the board are required to take an oath of office, which is filed in the office of the clerk of the county of New York. The board possesses the powers and privileges of a corporation and has as its legal adviser the corporation counsel of the city of New York. The city comptroller is the custodian of all the funds of the system, which consist of contributions from the members and corresponding payments from the city of New York based on actuarial values. The board is specifically authorized to receive as part of the funds “ the donations, legacies and gifts which may be made to the retirement system.” The interest of the members is based solely on actuarial values, and they have no additional interest in any gains or profits upon any investments made by the board. The gift of this testatrix, therefore, inures solely to the benefit of the city of New York. To the extent of the legacy, the city’s contribution to its free educational system is reduced and the general burden of the expense of education is relieved.
I hold, therefore, that the legacy comes within the quoted language, of section 249-s of the Tax Law as a gift for public purposes to a political subdivision of the State. I hold, further, that the
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.