In re the Estate of Pearson
Opinion of the Court
The litigated issue in this proceeding is the allocation of certain stock distributions between the income beneficiary and the principal interests of the trust here being accounted for. The investments through which the distributions were derived were made in 1955 in shares of General Motors Corporation, Standard Oil Company of New Jersey, and Socony Mobil Oil Company. In November, 1956 the trustee held 75 shares of General Motors Corporation and
Were the will silent as to the disposition required to be made by the trustee of these distributions, the additional shares received by reason of the stock splits would be allocated to the trust principal in order to avoid a diminution of principal. The additional shares received as a stock dividend also would be allocated to principal because section 17-a of the Personal Property Law dictates such a distribution of stock dividends as a means of facilitating estate administrations despite any inequity resulting therefrom. Of course, the disposition of stock dividends as well as other stock distributions can be controlled by a testator in which event allocation is governed neither by rules of equitable apportionment nor by section 17-a of the Personal Property Law. This testator has provided such a direction in the seventh article of his will where he said:
‘ ‘ All dividends, distributions and divisions of whatsoever sort, whether in cash or stocks, issued upon or in respect of stock of any corporation forming part of my estate or any trust fund herein created, including, but not by way of limitation, liquidating dividends, shall be paid over as income to the person or persons entitled to receive the income from such trust fund.”
The quoted direction is clear and unambiguous and there is no occasion to labor its interpretation. The direction that all dividends “ whether in cash or stock * * * shall be paid over as income ” comprehends all stock dividends. The direction that all “ distributions and divisions of whatsoever sort * * * including, but not by way of limitation, liquidating dividends, shall be paid over as income ” is an explicit mandate that stock distributions and divisions ordinarily applicable to principal shall be paid over as income. The testator in so providing necessarily was cognizant of the fact that compliance with his directions would not maintain the trust principal intact and that a diminution of principal was bound to result. That was the result he foresaw and wanted.
The trustee acknowledges that the seventh article of the will, read alone, can be given no different construction but the trustee urges that the circumstances existing at the date of the will as well as the general testamentary scheme limit the application of the seventh article to the holdings of the testator in a particular corporation whose assets were of a wasting nature. Neither the extraneous proof nor anything found in the will justifies this conclusion. The testament consists of a will and eight codicils, all executed on the same date before the same witnesses. The powers and authority of the fiduciaries are enumerated in great length in the most artful language and there can be no question of the draftsman’s ability to provide language applicable only to the administration of a particular asset had either the peculiar nature of that asset or the desire of the testator indicated the need for such limitation. Not only has this will been construed in the past as permitting investments currently available to fiduciaries but it explicitly grants a broad investment authority to be exercised in the trustee’s discretion under changing economic conditions. In accordance with the authority granted by the will the trustee invested in the corporations whose shares now present the problem at issue. It is inconceivable that, in view of such investment powers, the testator intended the seventh article of his will to apply to a
It is held that the stock distributions are payable to the income beneficiary.
Submit decree on notice.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.