New York Surrogate's Court, 1962

In re the Estate of Weill

In re the Estate of Weill
New York Surrogate's Court · Decided June 25, 1962 · Bennett
35 Misc. 2d 64; 229 N.Y.S.2d 503; 1962 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3041

Counsel

Jacob Goldsmith for petitioner. Zoltán Neumark for respondent.

In re the Estate of Weill

Opinion of the Court

John D. Bennett, S.

Motion by petitioner to strike the reply of the respondent to a notice to admit pursuant to section 322 of the Civil Practice Act on the ground that the reply has not been properly verified is denied.

The reply to the notice to admit has been verified by the attorney for the respondent, who is a resident of Vienna, Austria. Section 322 provides that the reply to a notice to admit be made by a “ sworn statement ” of the party to whom the request is directed.

A verified response to a notice to admit satisfies the requirement that the statement be sworn to by the party (Matter of Merritt, 187 Misc. 869) and a reply to a demand to admit, being *65analogous to a pleading, may in a proper ease be verified by the attorney for the party upon whom it is binding (Rules Civ. Prac., rule 99, subd. 3; Seidenberg v. Rosen, 114 N. Y. S. 2d 279).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.