In re the Estate of Hendy
Opinion of the Court
This is a probate proceeding in which certain unknown heirs were served by publication under an order dated May 8,1961. Publication was made in one paper on May 11,18, 25 and June 1,1961, and in the other on May 17, 24, 31 and June 7,1961. The return date of the citation so published was June 21,1961.
The affidavit on which the order of publication was obtained mentions a sister of the deceased residing in Bournemouth, Hants, England. An affidavit of the family tree was made by such sister on June 9, 1961, and certified by the Vice Consul of the United States of America at Southampton, England, on June 12, 1961. The papers are silent as to when this affidavit was received by the petitioner but the special guardian appointed June 21,1961, mentions having examined it in his report of July 28, 1961.
If no information as to names and addresses of “ unknown ” heirs had been received before the return date of the citation and the “ unknown ” heirs were in default, a novel question would have been presented as to whether such persons whose names and addresses were ascertained before the decree was signed would have to be made parties to the proceeding by supplemental citation.
However, that question is not presented on the record now before the court. Here, before the return of the citation, the
This court is of the opinion that such persons are not protected by a special guardian appointed June 21, 1961 for unknowns, as at that time those persons were not unknowns within the meaning of the statute.
The alternate relief requested by the petitioner that supplemental citation issue and be published is granted. The proposed supplemental citation and order of service of citation submitted will be examined and if found correct, completed and signed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.