In re the Estate of Huang
Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Paul K.E Huang died August 19, 2004 leaving an instrument dated October 7, 1998 which is being offered for probate.
EPTL 3-4.6 (a) provides: “If after executing a will the testator executes a later will which revokes or alters the prior one, a revocation of the later will does not, of itself, revive the prior will or any provision thereof.”
Decedent’s clear intent to revoke all prior wills by means of the April 29, 2004 instrument is both explicit: “I, Paul K. P Huang, being of sound mind, publish and declare this to be my last Will and Testament, revoking all former wills,” and implicit: the complete disposition of decedent’s estate (see Matter of Lautz, 55 Misc 2d 412, 413 [1967]). There is no evidence the October 7, 1998 instrument, or any other prior instrument, was revived (see EPTL 3-4.6 [b]); accordingly, decedent died intestate (see Estate of Mangan, NYLJ, Oct. 28, 1994, at 34, col 2).
Probate of the proffered instrument is denied; preliminary letters testamentary heretofore issued to petitioner are revoked.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.