City of East Cleveland v. Free
City of East Cleveland v. Free
Opinion of the Court
Epitomized Opinion
The city, at the instigation of Free, passed an ordinance authorizing bids for the establishment of a street railway in East Cleveland and a bid made by Free to build said railroad was found to be the best bid received. Free deposited with the city a bond in the sum of $5,000 by the Royal Indemnity Co., also a defendant, conditioned to be void if Free should complete the construction of the railway, otherwise to remain in full force. The city claimed $5000 as liquidated damages although the only actual damage was four dollars spent in advertising the ordinance. The lower court decided in favor of the city and entered a judgment for it for four dollars. The city prosecuted error claiming the full $5000; Held by court of appeals:
.1. A fixed sum provided as payment in the case of forfeiture of rights under or breach of contract is a penalty rather than liquidated damages. A person injured by breach of contract can only recover actual damage suffered limited by the amount stipulated in the contract.
2. Where a contract contains a number of stipulations to be performed for the breach of some of which damages are ascertainable, while as to others they are not, a single sum stipulated as damages for breach will be treated as a penalty and only actual damages can be recovered.
Judgment affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.