Ohio Court of Appeals, 1923

Cleveland Ry. Co. v. Rose

Cleveland Ry. Co. v. Rose
Ohio Court of Appeals · Decided February 19, 1923
1 Ohio Law. Abs. 283; 1923 Ohio Misc. LEXIS 1972

Cleveland Ry. Co. v. Rose

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM:

Epitomized Opinion

In the court below, the plaintiff recovered $3,000 damages for what the railroad company admits to be a liability case.

Plaintiff in error prosecutes error to this court for the purpose of reversing this judgment on the sole ground that it is not supported by sufficient evidence. We have gone through the' record, heard the arguments of counsel, and there was .evidence on the part of both plaintiff and the defendant, but the matter was tried to a jury and they saw the witnesses on behalf of the plaintiff and the defendant, and we cannot unanimously say that the verdict is so manifestly against the weight of the evidence, that it would warrant a reversal of ihe case. The judgment will, therefore, be af-1 firmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.