Ohio Court of Appeals, 1923

Wadley v. Roth

Wadley v. Roth
Ohio Court of Appeals · Decided May 4, 1923
1 Ohio Law. Abs. 568; 1923 Ohio Misc. LEXIS 1794

Wadley v. Roth

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Epitomized Opinion

The plaintiff, Roth, recovered a judgment against Wadley in the Court of Common Pleas and the defendant prosecuted error, claiming that the judgment is manifestly against the weight of evidence. The Court of Appeals held:

To reverse the judgment upon that ground, the law requires that all the members of the Appellate Court shall concur in a finding to that effect. This court being unanimously of the opinion that the judgment was not so against the weight of evidence. It is therefore affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.