Wadley v. Roth
Wadley v. Roth
1 Ohio Law. Abs. 568; 1923 Ohio Misc. LEXIS 1794
Wadley v. Roth
Opinion of the Court
Epitomized Opinion
The plaintiff, Roth, recovered a judgment against Wadley in the Court of Common Pleas and the defendant prosecuted error, claiming that the judgment is manifestly against the weight of evidence. The Court of Appeals held:
To reverse the judgment upon that ground, the law requires that all the members of the Appellate Court shall concur in a finding to that effect. This court being unanimously of the opinion that the judgment was not so against the weight of evidence. It is therefore affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.