Cuyahoga Lumber Co. v. Haber
Cuyahoga Lumber Co. v. Haber
Opinion of the Court
Epitomized Opinion
Published Only in Ohio Law Abstract
This action was instituted in Cuyahoga Common Pleas for a determination of the validity and priority of mortgages, mechanics’ liens, and a judgment lien upon certain premises in Cuyahoga County. A Fixture Co., under a contract, furnished and hung the electric fixtures. The Court of Appeals held:
1. “Compliance with 8312 GC. is essential to the perfecting of a mechanics’ lien by a contractor.”
2. “Substantial compliance with the requirements of the mechanics’ lien law will perfect a good and valid mechanics’ lien.”
3. “A company which in accordance with the contract furnishes fixtures and also hangs them in place, is a contractor.”
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.