Ohio Court of Appeals, 1924

Carl Construction Co. v. Hubley

Carl Construction Co. v. Hubley
Ohio Court of Appeals · Decided January 3, 1924
2 Ohio Law. Abs. 309

Carl Construction Co. v. Hubley

Opinion of the Court

BY THE COURT.

Epitomized Opinion

Published Only in Ohio Law Abstract

Default judgment was entered June 11, 1923. Within three days and during term a *310motion to vacate the default judgment was filed. The motion was sustained also during term. The case is still pending in the court below. Error is prosecuted to the order vacating the default judgment. A motion has been filed in this court to dismiss the proceedings in error upon the ground that there is no final judgment. This motion must be sustained upon the following authority: Continental Trust Company v. Home Fuel Company, 99 OS: 453; Higginbotham v. Atwater, 12 App. 80.

Attorneys — Parker & Brooks, for Carl Co.; William H. Miller, George R. Murray, for Hubley, all of Dayton.

Petition in error dismissed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.