Ohio Court of Appeals, 1924

Ralston v. Ralston Steel Car Co.

Ralston v. Ralston Steel Car Co.
Ohio Court of Appeals · Decided October 7, 1924 · Mauck
2 Ohio Law. Abs. 746; 1924 Ohio Misc. LEXIS 1488

Ralston v. Ralston Steel Car Co.

Opinion of the Court

MAUCK, J.

Epitomized Opinion

Published Only in Ohio Law Abstract

The administratrix of the estate of Joseph Ralston filed an action in, the Franklin Probate for the sale of the leasehold held by her decedent, for a term of 99 years, renewable forever, on certain real estate in Columbus, for the payment of the debts of the decedent. The widow of the decedent filed her answer, asking that the value of her dower estate in said leasehold be ascertained and that she be paid such value in cash. From the judgment rendered in the Probate, an appeal was taken to the Common Pleas and in this court it was determined that the widow had no dower in the property in question. The widow prosecuted error. In reversing the judgment of the lower court, the Court of Appeals held:

1. At common law the right of dower did not attach to a leasehold, one of the requirements of dower being that the deceased husband during coverture should be seized of an estate of inheritance in the land in which dower was claimed.

2. Under the law of Ohio a leasehold for a term of years, however long, is personal property.

3. Under 8597 GC. a leasehold is made an estate of inheritance and under 8606 GC. a widow is dowerable therein.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.