Lambeff v. State
Lambeff v. State
Opinion of the Court
Epitomized Opinion
Lambeff was charged with contributing to the delinquency of Cordelia Greenwood, a minor
1. As the evidence disclosed that Schons-berger came to Youngstown on a mission to make money “by criminal means and practices” contrary tó the ordinance in question, it cannot be, said that the conviction was manifestly against the weight of the evidence.
2. As the offense was not a second offense, as required by the ordinance, the municipal judge was not authorized to sentence the accused to 30 days or to any definite period of time; therefore that part of the ordinance is void for uncertainty and a sentence under it is contrary to law.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.