Swing v. Swing
Swing v. Swing
4 Ohio Law. Abs. 283; 1925 Ohio Misc. LEXIS 1012
Swing v. Swing
Opinion of the Court
The action in Hamilton Common Pleas was for partition. The Miami Savings & Loan Co. filed an answer and cross petition, praying for judgment.
Partition was abondoned, and judgment entered foreclosing the mortgage of the Savings & Loan Co. but not permitting assessing the attorneys fees. Error was prosecuted from this judgment, and the Court of Appeals held:
A court is not authorized to allow fees to counsel for a mortgage when the property is sold in foreclosure.-
Judgment affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.