Ohio Court of Appeals, 1926

Bliss v. Smith

Bliss v. Smith
Ohio Court of Appeals · Decided July 1, 1926 · Dist, Houck, Sayre, Shields
6 Ohio Law. Abs. 28

Bliss v. Smith

Opinion of the Court

HOUCK, J.

1. Where plaintiff took judgment on a cog-novit note, defendant by filing motion to set aside judgment in trial court, entered appearance.

2. Where plaintiff took judgment on cog-novit note, court was authorized to vacate and suspend judgment and give defendant opportunity to tender answer and file same, if it contained defense in law, and have case heard on merits.

(Shields and Sayre, JJ., concur.)

For reference to full opinion, see Omnibus Index, last page, this issue.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.