Ohio Court of Appeals, 1927

Oergel v. Ciehanski

Oergel v. Ciehanski
Ohio Court of Appeals · Decided October 10, 1927 · Cushing, Hamilton, Mills
5 Ohio Law. Abs. 764; 1927 Ohio Misc. LEXIS 1003

Oergel v. Ciehanski

Opinion of the Court

FULL TEXT.

PER CURIAM

In this case the trial court sustained a demurrer to the petition on the ground that the petition being a suit on a real estate contract fails to allege that the contract is in writing.

While Section 8621 provides that no action shall be brought, etc., the unbroken line of authorities hold that it is not necessary to allege in the petition that the contract is in writing, as the statute of frauds is a rule of evidence.

The petition was therefore good as against the demurrer and the demurrer should have been overruled.

The judgment will be reversed and the cause remanded with instructions to overrule the demurrer and re-instate the petition.

(Hamilton, PJ., Cushing, J., and Mills, J., concur in judgment.)

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.