Oergel v. Ciehanski
Oergel v. Ciehanski
5 Ohio Law. Abs. 764; 1927 Ohio Misc. LEXIS 1003
Oergel v. Ciehanski
Opinion of the Court
FULL TEXT.
In this case the trial court sustained a demurrer to the petition on the ground that the petition being a suit on a real estate contract fails to allege that the contract is in writing.
While Section 8621 provides that no action shall be brought, etc., the unbroken line of authorities hold that it is not necessary to allege in the petition that the contract is in writing, as the statute of frauds is a rule of evidence.
The petition was therefore good as against the demurrer and the demurrer should have been overruled.
The judgment will be reversed and the cause remanded with instructions to overrule the demurrer and re-instate the petition.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.