Whitlock v. State

Ohio Court of Appeals
Whitlock v. State, 21 Ohio Law. Abs. 393 (1936)
1936 Ohio Misc. LEXIS 1147
Crow, Guernsey, Klinger

Whitlock v. State

Opinion of the Court

*394OPINION

By KLINGER, PJ.

In the opinion of this court the overruling of a plea in abatement is not a final order under this section of the statutes. §13459-1 GC; §11582 GC.

See: 12 Ohio Jurisprudence, 741.

Wagner v State, 42 Oh St, 537.

Inskeep v State, 35 Oh St 482.

Inskeep v State, 36 Oh St 145.

Bogart v State, 9 Abs, 436.

This court, sitting in Wood County, in the case of State v James, held that a motion overruling a plea in abatement was not a final order from which error could be prosecuted and the note in the Bogart case in 9 Abs, refers to this ruling by this court.

The appeal and petition in error will be dismissed at the cost of the appellants.

CROW and GUERNSEY, JJ, concur.

Reference

Full Case Name
WHITLOCK et v. STATE
Cited By
5 cases
Status
Published