OPINION

It seems to this court that the case of the D., T. & I. Rd. Co. v Rohrs, 114 Oh St 493, is entirely dispositive of the situation here presented, and that reasonable minds could reasonably reach but one conclusion from the evidence, to-wit, that “there is no doubt that had she looked she must have seen the clanger, that was immediately at hand, in time to have avoided the injury.-’

It follows that we are of the opinion the trial court was correct in directing a ver*399diet for defendant; and the judgment of that court will accordingly be affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.