McKinney v. McKinney
McKinney v. McKinney
Opinion of the Court
OPINION
This cause, came on to be heard on August 27, 1936, on the appeal of Rigan McKinney and Elizabeth McKinney McIntosh, and on the appeal of Lucy
The court having considered said pleadings, stipulations and record, and the arguments and briefs of counsel, finds in favor of the respective appellees for the reasons stated in the opinion of said Probate Court, save and except as to the prayer for instructions and declaratory judgment determining the time when the corpus of the estate is or was distributable; as to which no 'finding is made and the petition is dismissed.
The court accordingly construes the said last will and testament of Price McKinney (Senior), deceased, and gives direction to the trustees' under said will, as follows: That the interest of Price McKinney, Jr., in the corpus of the trust estate held by said trustees was vested in him at the death of the testator Price McKinney (Senior), and is distributable to Tracy H. Duncan as administrator .of his estate; to which Rigan McKinney and Elizabeth McKinney McIntosh except. ;
It is accordingly hereby ordered, adjudged and decreed that distribution of the corpus of the trust estate shall be forthwith made, and that such distribution of the interest of Price McKin-, ney, Jr., consisting of two-ninths (2/9) thereof, shall be made to Tracy H. Duncan as administrator of his estate, to which Rigan McKinney and Elizabeth McKinney McIntosh except.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.