Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Ohio Court of Appeals, 1942

Cincinnati v. Correll

Cincinnati v. Correll
Ohio Court of Appeals · Decided May 18, 1942 · Matthews, Ross
36 Ohio Law. Abs. 534; 45 N.E.2d 152; 1942 Ohio App. LEXIS 866

Cincinnati v. Correll

Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BY THE COURT:

This is an appeal from a judgment of the Municipal Court of Cincinnati, 'finding the appellant guilty of violating section 523-1 (al of the City Ordinances, making it unlawful to permit barber shops to be open for business of barber - ing during certain hours.

The ordinance is in all essential respects identical with the ordinances of the City of Zanesville, which was sustained in Wilson v Zanesville, 130 Oh St 286. On the authority of this case, the judgment is affirmed.

MATTHEWS, PJ., & ROSS, J., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑