Ohio Court of Appeals, 1950

Pitz v. Hall

Pitz v. Hall
Ohio Court of Appeals · Decided September 18, 1950 · Hornbeck, Miller, Wiseman
60 Ohio Law. Abs. 270; 101 N.E.2d 396

Pitz v. Hall

Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By THE COURT.

We have read and considered the entire.record and find no *271alleged errors well made. Any defect in service was waived by a general appearance on the part of the defendant. Vol. 32, O. Jur. pp. 511, 512. Furthermore, it reasonably appears that Mrs. William B. Hall and Lucille Hall is one and the same person. We find no error in the record which affects the substantial rights of the defendant and in our opinion substantial justice has been done.

Judgment affirmed.

MILLER, PJ, HORNBECK and WISEMAN, JJ, concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.