Ohio Court of Appeals, 1960

Cornett v. Wm. Lang & Sons Co.

Cornett v. Wm. Lang & Sons Co.
Ohio Court of Appeals · Decided April 20, 1960 · Eighth, First, Hurd, Kovachy, Skeel
87 Ohio Law. Abs. 576; 175 N.E.2d 105; 14 Ohio Op. 2d 206; 1960 Ohio App. LEXIS 802

Cornett v. Wm. Lang & Sons Co.

Opinion of the Court

By The Court.

Judgment affirmed. The record in this case discloses abundant evidence to support the verdict of the jury, which verdict, in essence, found that plaintiff’s fall and injuries were directly and proximately the result of the combined and concurrent negligence of each of the defendants; moreover the answers of the jury to interrogatories submitted to it are consistent with the verdict.

Upon a careful consideration of assignments of error herein, we find no error prejudicial to the substantial rights of the appellant for the reasons generally stated in the opinion of the trial court and accordingly we determine and certify that in our opinion substantial justice has been done to the party complaining as shown by the record.

Hurd, P. J., Kovachy So Skeel, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.