Ohio Court of Appeals, 1963

State v. Wetzel

Ohio Court of Appeals · Decided August 13, 1963 · Duffy, Bryant, Troop

194 N.E.2d 911; 118 Ohio App. 368; 25 Ohio Op. 2d 261; 1963 Ohio App. LEXIS 800 (North Eastern Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

State v. Crawley (Ohio Ct. App. 1994)
State v. Ricciardi (Ohio Ct. App. 1999)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Duffy, P. J.

The state of Ohio has filed a motion asking for a dismissal of this appeal for the reason that the order for which the defendant, appellant herein, has attempted to appeal is not a final or appealable order, and that jurisdiction has not as yet been conferred on this court. The appeal has been taken from the overruling of a motion to suppress evidence.

The defendant-appellant has not answered the motion, but it appears that the order appealed from is not a final or appeal-able order. See Section 2953.02 of the Revised Code and State v. Holbrook, 105 Ohio App., 414.

The motion to dismiss will be, and hereby is, sustained, and the cause remanded to the trial court for further proceedings according to law.

Motion sustained.

Bryant and Troop, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.